Obama’s War On Coal Is A War On The Poor. Higher Energy Prices = More Poor People = More Dead Children
Obama Takes ‘War on Coal’ Global
The Treasury Department said Tuesday it is taking steps to cut U.S. support for coal-fired power plants worldwide in a move to combat global warming.
Hopefully he can protect the climate half as well as he protected the Benghazi embassy personnel.
If Catastrophic Climate Change was really happening it would not be necessary to lie so much to make people buy into it.
In the 1990 IPCC report, the Medieval Warm Period was much warmer than the late 20th century.
But in the 2001 IPCC report, the Medieval Warm period disappeared and became much cooler than the late 20th century.
By pure coincidence, in the year 1995 the IPCC made a decision to make the Medieval Warm Period disappear.
The EPA is stacking the deck with more Charlatan Scientists masquerading as legitimate scientists.
Francesca Grifo PhD, doyen of scientific integrity at the Union of Concerned Scientists, has been appointed in charge of scientific integrity at EPA, a lateral move, junk science in the private enviro sector to the same role in government.
With this appointment the EPA accomplishes two things, cover for continued junk science and a thumb in the eye of any serious critic of EPA scientific misconduct.
View original post 207 more words
People are gradually waking up to the fact that President Obama and his cohorts in the UN are failing developed & developing Nations with their regressive policies that kill and harm poor people in developing Nations by denying them access to cheap and reliable energy from fossil fuel and by curtailing progress and economic growth in Developed Nations by skyrocketing fuel prices that stunts growth and destroys jobs. The truth is Obama’s Climate Regulation Crack down to mitigate CO2 emissions via killing fossil fuel as a source of energy has no tangible impact on climate change. President Obama and the EPA are fully aware their efforts are All Pain for No Gain but they don’t care. http://pjmedia.com/blog/un-climate-delegates-failing-everyone-developed-and-developing-alike/ …
Maybe because the only people who benefit are Obama’s and Harry Reid’s crony green capitalists who produce nothing of value at the tax payer expense. http://greencorruption.blogspot.com/
California is losing jobs to Texas, making poor people poorer, killing 1000s of birds and bats with Wind Turbines, converting fertile farm land that grows food crops to solar farms that also kill lost of birds. CARB should be charged with Climate Fraud
The feel good do bad people of the UN.
After frisking us for explosives, the UN repeatedly assures us that we’re good people.
The above photo wasn’t taken at an airport. This is the entrance to the UN climate summit here in Warsaw. UN-issued photo ID, electronic scanning on departure as well as entry, and an overt police presence apparently don’t provide sufficient peace of mind.
What is the UN so afraid of? Has anyone ever faced the slightest threat to their person inside one of these events – given the special entrances for VIPs, the roped-off areas, and the security personnel everywhere?
There’s a good argument that the searches to which we all now submit at airports are supported by little evidence, that these measures amount to “security theatre“. It’s worth noting that the UN – rather than challenging that approach to the world – is itself helping to normalize it.
But here’s the bizarre part…
View original post 308 more words
What Kind of Society Values Free Contraceptives For Suzy Q More Than Life Saving Care For Infants, Grandparents, Handicap and Cancer Patients?
“Services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.”
“When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.”
“Strict youngest-first allocation directs scarce resources predominantly to infants. This approach seems incorrect. The death of a 20-year-old woman is intuitively worse than that of a 2-month-old girl, even though the baby has had less life. The 20-year-old has a much more developed personality than the infant, and has drawn upon the investment of others to begin as-yet-unfulfilled projects…. Adolescents have received substantial substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants, by contrast, have not yet received these investments…. It is terrible when an infant dies, but worse, most people think, when a three-year-old child dies, and worse still when an adolescent does.”
“Ultimately, the complete lives system does not create ‘classes of Untermenschen whose lives and well being are deemed not worth spending money on,’ but rather empowers us to decide fairly whom to save when genuine scarcity makes saving everyone impossible.”
“Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely ‘lipstick’ cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change. Savings will require changing how doctors think about their patients. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others.”
“Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.”
“Every favor to a constituency should be linked to support for the health-care reform agenda. If the automakers want a bailout, then they and their suppliers have to agree to support and lobby for the administration’s health-reform effort.”
There is little doubt that the people of America would be up in arms and bringing out the pitch forks if they knew that the architect of Obamacare, Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel, appears to have founded Obamacare on the Eugenics philosophies of Dr. Mengele.