Skip to content

Archive for

31
Mar

An attorney asks: Are Climate Skeptics Legally Liable for Criminal Negligence?

Catastrophic Climate Change Believers or Warmists have put humanity on trial for the crime of destroying the earth via their use of fossil fuel and found humanity guilty. Humanity’s sentence is rolling back the Industrial Age and reverting back to the Dark Ages when life was short and brutal. The reason the Warmists are now using threats of legal liability for opposing their views that humanity are evil pests who deserve to be punished for the sin of destroying the earth; is that if their misanthropic beliefs were put on trial they are the ones who would likely be held criminally liable for all the pain and suffering to humanity and to Nature their beliefs have already been responsible for. Perhaps this is why Warmists are ramping up a Climate Of Fear to attack anyone who dares to expose the basic foundation of their beliefs is fear and loathing of humanity.. As the so called “science” of Climate Change crumbles via exposure by so called “Deniers” the Warmists defense is to intimidate the “Deniers” into silence before the whole house of Climate Change cards collapses and their true agenda is exposed.
The IPCC and EPA Should be investigated for Green Climate Crimes:
IPCC Climate Report has led to EPA regulations that are All Pain For No Gain:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10644867/We-have-failed-to-prevent-global-warming-so-we-must-adapt-to-it.html
The IPCC and EPA Facilitates the Rich Getting Richer for example in the US http://greencorruption.blogspot.com
While the Poor Get Shafted with “skyrocketing” fuel costs they cannot afford to pay for that condemns the poor to a life time of poverty.
http://wp.me/p7y4l-lnm
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/the-environmentalist-eugenics-of-the-left/#.UyHMYICh0uM.twitter
IPCC Climate Report lead to EPA regulations that:
Destroy Nature with Bird and Bat killing Wind Turbines/Solar
and Biofuel crops that
Destroys vast areas of natural habitats and
Land that grows food crops for people
Produces a fraction of the energy fossil fuel does at very high costs that hurt the poor the most
Are weather dependent and do not work in severe weather.
http://youtu.be/5igyXyJKL_0
http://youtu.be/RnbaIF6gJY0
http://www.examiner.com/article/green-energy-solar-farm-cooks-birds-mid-flight
The IPCC and EPA Use politics (not science) to form their reports when the empirical data contradicts their doom and gloom findings:
How the Global Warming Scare Began http://youtu.be/SyUDGfCNC-k

Watts Up With That?

Attorney arguing his case

Guest essay by Roger E. Sowell, Esq. reposted with permission from Sowell’s Law Blog

In the past month, several articles appeared calling for the jailing of those who provide financial support for research into climate science with an objective of proving that man-made climate change does not exist.  An overview is provided at WattsUpWithThat (see link).  Responses to the call for jailing are numerous.

The background on this is that three sides exist in the climate change argument: one, the warmists, those who fervently believe that man’s activities by
burning fossil fuels will drive up the Earth’s temperature and cause all manner of horrible happenings; two, the skeptics, those who understand that the science simply does not support the warmists’ view, that any increase in global temperature is related to natural cycles but not to man’s fossil fuel consumption; and three, lukewarmers, those whose…

View original post 2,670 more words

30
Mar

A timed for IPCC report claim: Meeting climate targets may require reducing meat and dairy consumption

First they came after the cheese, than the; cows next they came after the humans. Everyone must eat Solyent Green.

Watts Up With That?

From the Chalmers University of Technology

Greenhouse gas emissions from food production may threaten the UN climate target of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, according to research at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.

On Monday 31 March the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) presents their report on the impacts of climate change.

View original post 312 more words

29
Mar

When the “Cure” Is Worse than the Alleged “Disease” Who Should be “Arrested” for Climate Crimes?

28
Mar

Matt Ridley’s new article in the WSJ – a dose of pragmatism about revelations from the new IPCC report

Climate Change Is Not The Problem Fuel Poverty Is. Higher Fuel Prices = More Poor People = More Children Dying and when you add in starvation we need more CO2 to feed the world which burning fossil fuel provides. CO2 Emissions to date from Fossil Fuel has resulted in a 14% greening of the Earth! Down with the Climate Change Alarmists . Lets all be happy and Celebrate!!!

Watts Up With That?

Art for WSJ by David Klein

This will be a top sticky post for a day, new stories will appear below this one.

Climate Forecast: Muting the Alarm

Even while it exaggerates the amount of warming, the IPCC is becoming more cautious about its effects.

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will shortly publish the second part of its latest report, on the likely impact of climate change. Government representatives are meeting with scientists in Japan to sex up—sorry, rewrite—a summary of the scientists’ accounts of storms, droughts and diseases to come.

But the actual report, known as AR5-WGII, is less frightening than its predecessor seven years ago.

View original post 714 more words

28
Mar

More fun with ‘Coloring Reality’ and University of Maine’s CLIMATE REANALYZER™

Mountain of Evidence Shows The Earth Is Cooling But Climate Alarmists Use Tricks and Data Tampering to Show Warming Where There Is None . Why the Lies? To Keep The Government Money Rolling Maybe?

Watts Up With That?

arcticsstnowcast[1] Earlier, we talked about how NOAA NCDC made February look warmer by choosing some nice pastel colors for “below normal” temperature in the USA.

Now, WUWT regular Chris Beal points me to the Arctic to look at sea surface temperatures, claiming they are running red hot.

A quick look at our WUWT Sea Ice Page tells me it looks pretty cool, like zero or below for a good portion of the Arctic. See the SST image at right and note the purplish-pink hue represents approximately 0°C

So, then whats up with this SST map from the University of Maine (up there in the vast wasteland known as Taminoland) that shows red roasted pepper color all over the Arctic? Is it Arctic Amplification Gone Wild?

View original post 294 more words

27
Mar

Obama’s Solution To Protect US from Severe Weather? Use Weather Dependent Sources of Of Energy That Won’t Work In Severe Weather

Radical Environmentalists, President Obama and the Democrats want to condemn people to a life time of poverty to solve a non-existent global warming problem in the name of “saving the planet”. “Saving the Planet” based on a religious belief that humans are destroying the planet via their use of fossil fuel. A religious belief that by doing penance the earth can be “saved” from the sins of man when the facts show reducing CO2 emissions from fossil fuel will have little if any impact on mitigating climate change. In other words all pain for no gain.  Self flagellation may be what the Catastrophic Climate Change followers like President Obama believe is the best way to save the earth, but most rational science grounded people know that self flagellation is not the way to Utopia.


Earth to the President Obama, historical data for almost a million years shows that carbon dioxide (CO2) levels have had NO impact on temperatures. CO2 was 10X higher when the earth was both warmer and cooler
which completely negates the Catastrophic Climate Change Theory that President Obama is trying to sell to the world. Selling to world using fear mongering that relies on the false predictions of computer models. Computer models that predicted that as CO2 rose so would the temperatures but the computer models were wrong. For 17+ years the temperatures have remained flat despite the rise in CO2. 
Ergo the Climate models have been proven false by reality. Same goes for the list of climate catastrophes falsely associated with the rise in CO2. Centuries of data show the occurrences of climate catastrophes when CO2 levels were lower and not increasing. The reality is that despite the increasing level of CO2 catastrophic events are LESS frequent and powerful today not more.


Moreover, It defies logic to spend trillions of dollars on energy from Solar, Wind and Biofuel crops that are weather dependent sources of energy. If the Sun doesn’t shine, the wind doesn’t blow just right or their is a drought Solar, Wind and Biofuel crops produce NO power! So what do the genius in the EPA (who believe in Catastrophic Climate Change Theory) dictate we must do to protect the world against THEIR unfounded fears of more severe weather? Answer: Use energy sources from Wind, Solar and Biofuel crops that WILL NOT work in severe weather!


Energy from Fossil fuel is the lifeblood of developed Western industrial civilization. The use of cheap and reliable energy from fossil fuel has eliminated hunger, poverty, lack of shelter, drudgery, and provided healthier, more comfortable, and longer lifespans. It is estimated that the US has over one hundred years or more of cheap and reliable deposits of fossil fuels – coal, oil, and natural gas on Public land. Eliminating the use of fossil fuel resources and replacing them with high cost and unreliable WEATHER dependent renewable energy sources (like wind, solar and biofuel) will result in a substantially lower standard of living for the US and condemn developing nations to perpetual poverty. President Obama and the Democrats need to stop their war on coal which is a war on poor people and children. Higher Fuel Prices = More Poor People = More Children Dying.

26
Mar

A Religion Based On Lies

Richard Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it all [xv] when it comes to the corruption within the EPA and other Climate Alarmists like the Sierra Club whose goal appears to be to “roll back the Industrial Age” with their job and economy killing anti fossil fuel beliefs and regulations.

“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early twenty-first century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.”

Moreover, to add insult to injury the EPA anti fossil fuel CO2 regs won’t mitigate Climate Change http://wp.me/p7y4l-rvo or “fix weather” per the University of Manchester http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/03/20/linking-storms-to-climate-change-a-distraction-say-experts/ So the next question is why is Obama, the EPA and the UN so obsessed on wasting trillions of dollars on reducing CO2 emissions from fossil fuel when it will have no impact on mitigating climate change? Money maybe? http://greencorruption.blogspot.com

Real Science

In the absence of any warming during the lives of nearly one third of the people on Earth, the team has changed strategy to simply crank out one lie after another. Some of the notable ones from the past two years are :

  • Biggest fire in Colorado history (off by a factor of 100)
  • Biggest flood in Colorado history (off by a factor of 5+)
  • Sandy was the biggest storm in history
  • Philippines typhoon had the highest wind speeds in history
  • 2012 was the most extreme year in US history
  • Arctic ice is the lowest winter maximum on record
  • 97% of scientists believe global warming is Mann-made and a serious threat
  • etc. etc. etc.

The people behind this have no morals or integrity. It is about money, power, control, and useful idiots.

View original post

25
Mar

Geologic Record Shows Sun (Not CO2) Drives Climate Change – Models Meaningless

Below is an excerpt from Chapter One of  Don J. Easterbrook book

Don J. Easterbrook

Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA

http://myweb.wwu.edu/dbunny/pdfs/easterbrook_geologic-evidence-of-recurring-climatic-cycles.pdf

“Predictions based on past warming and cooling cycles over the past 500 years

accurately predicted the end of the 19771998 warm period and the 
establishment of cool Pacific sea surface temperatures. Past patterns strongly suggest
that the next several decades will be cooler, not warmer.

Considering the positive correlations between solar activity and global
climate change, what if the cause of global warming is solar, rather than
atmospheric CO2? Then all of the computer models are meaningless, and we
can look to past natural climatic cycles as a basis for predicting future climate
changes. The climatic fluctuations over the past few hundred years suggest ~30-
year climatic cycles of global warming and cooling, on a general rising trend
from the Little Ice Age cool period. The PDO over the past century (Fig. 58)”
25
Mar

Lewandowsky Ghost-wrote Conclusions of UWA Ethics Investigation into “Hoax”

Did UWA circle the wagons puts ethical standards in the trash re validity of Lewandowsky #Climate Sceptic Allegations?

Climate Audit

Following the retraction of Lewandowsky’s Fury, the validity of University of Western Australia ethics “investigations” is again in the news. At present, we have negligible information on the University’s investigation into Fury, but we do have considerable (previously unanalysed) information on their earlier and illusory “investigation” into prior complaints about the ethics application for Moon Landing Hoax (“Hoax”).

This earlier “investigation” (recently cited at desmog here and Hot Whopper here) supposedly found that the issues that I had raised in October 2012 were “baseless” and that the research in Hoax was “conducted in compliance with all applicable ethical guidelines”.

However, these conclusions were not written by a university investigation or university official but by Lewandowsky himself and simply transferred to university letterhead by UWA Deputy Vice Chancellor Robyn Owens within minutes after Lewandowsky had sent her language that was acceptable to him.

In today’s post, I’ll set out…

View original post 4,237 more words

24
Mar

IPCC: Biofuels do more harm than good?

Biofuel crops harm the environment and raise food prices. Ditto Wind and Solar as small birds, bats and eagles are killed on the blades of wind turbines,; birds are burned alive in flight over solar panels and both wind turbines and solar require enormous amounts of land mass that could better be used to grow food crops or left in their natural state instead of devastating the natural habitat of the land they blight.

JunkScience.com

That’s the report found in the Telegraph.

View original post 255 more words

Real Science

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" - Richard Feynman

Climate Audit

by Steve McIntyre

Disrupted Physician

The Physician Wellness Movement and Illegitimate Authority: The Need for Revolt and Reconstruction

WeatherAction News

News on Piers, Earth & Space Weather Action, Climate, Seismic Hazards....it's the Sun stupid!

the Air Vent

Because the world needs another opinion

tannngl

News of the day

The Big Green Lie

De-Bunking the Green Scam World-Wide

Inform The Pundits!

A sane person's attempt to make sense of the news

Bob Tisdale - Climate Observations

Sea Surface Temperature, Ocean Heat Content, and Other Climate Change Discussions

Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Power To The People

Musings About The Incoherent Dichotomy Of The Liberal Mind

Pointman's

A lagrange point in life

hauntingthelibrary

Thinking from a different direction

sunshine hours

Question Authority

JunkScience.com

All the junk that’s fit to debunk.

THE RIVER WALK

Daily Thoughts and Meditations as we journey together with our Lord.

The GOLDEN RULE

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” – George Orwell

Tallbloke's Talkshop

Cutting edge science you can dice with

Big Picture News, Informed Analysis

Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise has been watching the climate world since 2009. What she sees isn't pretty.

%d bloggers like this: