Important study on temperature adjustments: ‘homogenization…can lead to a significant overestimate of rising trends of surface air temperature.’
If NOAA adjusting Temperature Data To “over estimate rising trends” how can President Obama claim “Climate Change is a fact” ?
From the “we told you so” department comes this paper out of China that quantifies many of the very problems with the US and global surface temperature record we have been discussing for years: the adjustments add more warming than the global warming signal itself
A paper just published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology finds that the data homogenization techniques commonly used to adjust temperature records for moving stations and the urban heat island effect [UHI] can result in a “significant” exaggeration of warming trends in the homogenized record.
The effect of homogenization is clear and quite pronounced. What they found in China is based on how NOAA treats homogenization of the surface temperature record.
View original post 1,004 more words
Even Nature is conceding Global Warming has stopped http://notrickszone.com/2014/01/16/the-stages-of-the-warming-hiatus-reaches-new-level-from-nothing-to-noise-and-now-to-a-full-blown-trend-nature-concedes/
By declaring an official and unassailable scientific position on “climate change”- it is now career threatening for any government scientist to produce evidence to the contrary. Undoubtedly the most disgusting anti-science event in US history.
Climate change is a completely vague, nebulous, undefinable concept, so Obama can use his decree as an excuse to purge anyone who doesn’t fall in line.
Interior Secretary Sally Jewell wants to get rid of any climate change denial at the agency
Welcome to Obama Soviet Socialist Banana Republic
Freezing Temperatures In US More Likely Due To Quiet Sun – Not Global Warming As President Obama Claims
Newsweek – April 28, 1974
Whereas today Climate Scientists (and President Obama) are claiming that Global Warming (not Global Cooling) is responsible for the cold weather the US is experiencing. The theory is that Global Warming causes less Arctic ice which in turn causes the jet stream to ridge in the Arctic and trough in the lower latitudes which circulates in the meridional atmosphere thus causing the cold out breaks in the US. Get it? This is pure hog wash in my opinion.
Back in the 1970s there were record amounts of Arctic Sea Ice yet the aforementioned jet stream scenario played out in a similar pattern back then with the same cold temperature patterns as today. Ergo there is no correlation with less or thicker Arctic Ice and cold Jet Stream bursts responsible for freezing weather in the US.
In Summary: Back in the 1970s Arctic Sea Ice was a lot thicker than it is today. 1975 : NCAR and CRU Called Global Cooling The “New Norm” And Blamed Climate Disasters On It based on EXPANDING sea ice in the Arctic!!! So now it just does not make any sense to blame cold weather today on global warming due to thinner ice (not thicker ice like back in the 1970s) unless you twist yourself into a pretzel.
The real reason for the cold streak is most probably the quiet Sun as documented in numerous scientific studies including The Neglected Sun: How the Sun Precludes Climate Catastrophe [Paperback]
However, once again President Obama is using song and dance hot air (or lies in my opinion), as justification for imposing his lame brain ideas like Obamacare and now Climate Mitigation on the people of United States in a futile attempt to “save the climate” from those pesky humans. This is just plain wrong. Climate Change Is Not The Problem – Fuel Poverty Is. Higher Fuel Prices = More Poor People = More Children Dying.
If President Obama is sincere about alleviating income inequality and creating more jobs he would stop his war on the US fossil fuel industry. Instead, President Obama would do all in his power to create real wealth for all people living in the United States. Real wealth for all by opening up Federal Land to Fossil Fuel exploration and development. Opening up Federal Land to Fossil Fuel development would create millions of high paying jobs, raise millions of people up from poverty and to add icing to the cake help pay down our 17 Trillion dollar debt. That should be a no brainer if President Obama was being honest about his goal of creating more jobs and alleviating income inequality. Yes or No?
President Obama appears to be brain dead when it comes to how to address the energy needs of our Nation. The bottom line is so called “clean energy” he is touting is not cheap energy. Moreover, so called clean energy is responsible for the death of millions of poor people via fuel poverty http://wp.me/p7y4l-lnm
Clean Energy is more harmful to the environment than fossil fuel Climate Crimes – Englische Version — http://youtu.be/5igyXyJKL_0
So called “clean” energy is unsustainable which Germany learned the hard way after wasting billions on it. So, guess what, Germany is converting back to coal.
What is most ironic however is that CO2 emmisions from fossil fuel are actually good for the planet and other living things like plants and food for the poor. Any problem with that? Hmmm http://news.heartland.org/news…
The bottom line is empirical data has proven the CO2 AGW theory false. CO2 has risen but global temperatures have not.
Another Year, Another Nail in the CAGW Coffin (Now Includes December Data) http://wp.me/p7y4l-qA4 via @wattsupwiththat
Corporation raiding Algonquin territory for minerals, selling to Toyota for Prius battery production
Prius’s are not so green after all.
First Lady Michelle Obama acting dignified in the Oval Office of the White House, Not
The ghost of George wept.
I’m sure there’s a segment of the American public — let’s call them dickless cucks — who look at this and see a vision of progress, an America hurtling toward a bright future of rhythmic world beats, Oval Office courtship displays, and white pissboys gamely pretending to enjoy their cultural annihilation. But those of us with a bigger picture mentality see a different harbinger.
NCDC US Temperatures are “completely broken and meaningless. Should not be used as a basis for making decisions on climate protection policies that will waste billions of dollars of futile efforts to regulate the climate.
I spent the evening comparing USHCN V1 and V2 graphs, and discovered a huge discrepancy between their V1 and V2 adjustments.
This is their current US graph. Note that there is a discontinuity at 1998, which doesn’t look right. Globally, temperatures plummeted in 1999-2000, but they didn’t in the US graph.
It doesn’t look right, because they made a huge change going from USHCN V1 to V2.
In V1 they adjusted recent temperatures upwards (thin line below) and made little adjustment to older temperatures.
But when they switched to V2, they started adjusting older temperatures downwards, and left post-2000 temperatures more or less intact. This created a huge jump (greater than one degree) downwards for all years prior to 2000. You can see what they did in the animation below.
Blue line is thermometer data. Thin red line is…
View original post 589 more words