I am here to help you. Resistance is Futile.
Obama just announced no attack in Syria so why did CNN report 300 Marines in Syria than hide the story?
Climate models “proving” Catastrophic CO2 Climate Change have been disproven by reality.
Since failures in climate science claims are on the rise, can we start naming climate prediction failures after scientists and activists? I can think of a few: The Hansen Hiatus, for example.
Climate campaigners seem to think they have a winner with this takedown of elected officials who reject global warming science, in which fake news reports talk of the turmoil and tragedy created by Hurricane Marco Rubio, Hurricane James Inhofe, Hurricane John Boehner and more.
The trouble is, the science on a connection between hurricanes and global warming is going in the opposite direction, if the near-final draft of next month’s climate science assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is any indication.
Andrew Revkin at NYT’s DOT Earth
View original post 923 more words
When reality has no relationship to your AGW Alarmist theory deny, lie and smear. Other wise the green money train from government subsidies might come to an end.
NPR says no warming for 15 years.
A study in the journal Nature could help explain why the Earth’s average temperature hasn’t increased during the past 15 years
Trenberth says non-existent global warming is accelerating.
Send us lots more money, because we are a bunch of flaming imbeciles and liars.
It’s official, there is no “runaway global warming” that “will destroy our civilization” in fact the data shows no signs of increasing heat waves or extreme weather. http://notrickszone.com/2013/08/24/observed-temperature-data-show-no-signs-of-increasing-global-heat-waves-or-extremes/
As to green energy being so great Germany’s experience after spending a trillions of euros is that their coal consumption has gone up and so has CO2 emissions. http://notrickszone.com/2013/02/20/germanys-climate-warming-co2-emissions-rose-in-2012-despite-1-trillion-euro-renewable-energy-transition/
Time to stop the AGW scam and spend our limited resources on resolving real problems not imaginary ones.
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, reporting from Erice, Sicily
ERICE, SICILY – It’s official. The scare is over. The World Federation of Scientists, at its annual seminars on planetary emergencies, has been advised by its own climate monitoring panel that global warming is no longer a planetary emergency.
View original post 1,334 more words
Why would President Obama want to appoint Cass Sunstein to the NSA Oversight Board to address concerns the NSA may be illegally spying on American citizens? Is it because Cass Sunstein shares President Obama’s beliefs that: Speech should be regulated by the government; Animals have the same rights as humans; Americans do not have the right to own a gun for the purpose of defending their lives; That the money individuals have worked for is not theirs (sounds a bit like slavery that one)? All of the aforementioned beliefs sound a bit wacko to me but more and more President Obama appears to be leading America into an “Alice In Wonderland” future composed of a “mad’ ruling elite.
“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat: “we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.”
“How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.
“You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.”
(Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Chapter 6)
“A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government.”
“A legislative effort to regulate broadcasting in the interest of democratic principles should not be seen as an abridgment of the free speech guarantee.”
“I have argued in favor of a reformulation of First Amendment law. The overriding goal of the reformulation is to reinvigorate processes of democratic deliberation, by ensuring greater attention to public issues and greater diversity of views.”
“…[I]n light of astonishing economic and technological changes, we must doubt whether, as interpreted, the constitutional guarantee of free speech is adequately serving democratic goals. It is past time for a large-scale reassessment of the appropriate role of the First Amendment in the democratic process.”
“The site’s of one point of view agree to provide links to sites of the other point of view. So if you’re reading a conservative magazine, they would provide a link to a liberal site. And vice versa, just to make it easy for people to access to competing views.
Or maybe a popup on your screen that would show you an advertisement or maybe even a quick argument for a competing view.
If we could get voluntary arrangements in that direction, it would be great and if we can’t get voluntary arrangements maybe Congress should hold hearings about mandates.”
Sunstein verbally shuffles around and throws out the “aw shucks” smokescreen: “If we could do this voluntarily…”
“Sometimes, the word ‘voluntary’ is a little complicated…”
– Cass Sunstein
“Consider the view that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to own guns. The view is respectable, but it may be wrong, and prominent specialists reject it on various grounds. As late as 1980, it would have been preposterous to argue that the Second Amendment creates an individual right to own guns, and no federal court invalidated a gun control restriction on Second Amendment grounds until 2007. Yet countless Americans politicians, in recent years, have acknowledged that they respect the
individual right to bear arms, at least in general terms. Their views are a product of the energetic efforts of meaning entrepreneurs – some from the National Rifle Association, who have press a particular view of the Second Amendment. ”
“The National Association of Broadcasters and others with similar economic interests typically use the First Amendment in precisely the same way the National Rifle Association uses the Second Amendment. We should think of the two camps as jurisprudential twins.”
Hunting & Animal Rights
“We ought to ban hunting”
“[Humans’] willingness to subject animals to unjustified suffering will be seen … as a form of unconscionable barbarity… morally akin to slavery and the mass extermination of human beings.”
“In what sense in the money in our pockets and bank accounts fully ‘ours’? Did we earn it by our own autonomous efforts? Could we have inherited it without the assistance of probate courts? Do we save it without the support of bank regulators? Could we spend it if there were no public officials to coordinate the efforts and pool the resources of the community in which we live?… Without taxes there would be no liberty. Without taxes there would be no property. Without taxes, few of us would have any assets worth defending. [It is] a dim fiction that some people enjoy and exercise their rights without placing any burden whatsoever on the public fisc. … There is no liberty without dependency. That is why we should celebrate tax day …”
Second Bill of Rights
“My major aim in this book is to uncover an important but neglected part of America’s heritage: the idea of a second bill of rights. In brief, the second bill attempts to protect both opportunity and security, by creating rights to employment, adequate food and clothing, decent shelter, education, recreation, and medical care.”
“Much of the time, the United States seems to have embraced a confused and pernicious form of individualism. This approach endorses rights of private property and freedom of contract, and respects political liberty, but claims to distrust “government intervention” and insists that people must fend for themselves. This form of so-called individualism is incoherent, a tangle of confusions.”
“For better or worse, the Constitution’s framers gave no thought to including social and economic guarantees in the bill of rights.”
“Animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives…”
Anti Fracking Protest
A fine little girl she waits for me
She’s as plastic as she can be
She paints her face with plastic goo
And wrecks her hair with some shampoo
Oh, baby, now you’re such a drag
A strong case can be made that the green anti fossil fuel campaign is impoverishing and killing poor people by using government force to bar poor people from access to cheap and reliable energy from fossil fuel.
Higher Fuel Costs = More Poor People = More Children Dying. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/15/james-hansen…
and are causing more harm to the environment with bird and bat killing wind turbines, toxic solar panels and by destroying forests to grow crops for biofuel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORiooCvMac
By the way scientific theory says that when the empirical evidence does not agree with your theory the theory is wrong. The AGW theory says when CO2 goes up so do the Temperatures. Not. CO2 is up but temperatures have been flat for 17 years. Ergo AGW theory has been proven by empirical data to be wrong. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
Limiting scientific debate: A change in the AGU policy on Presenting Alternative Scientific Viewpoints
AGW Climate Change Zealots highlight the decline of our society. Their anti fossil fuel campaign is morally indefensible as it is the poor who are impoverished and die due to “skyrocketing” fuel costs the poor cannot afford to pay for. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/15/james-hansens-policies-are-shafting-the-poor/ Their faith in government to control our energy resources attracks corruption like a magnet. Green energy is inefficient, high price and fails to deliver the energy promised. A few insiders get richer while the poor get poorer. Tax payer money is siphoned off and handed over to looters and profiteers like Solyndra. http://greencorruption.blogspot.com/
Guest essay by Roger A. Pielke Sr.
In the August 20 2013 issue of EOS both the AGU Statement on Climate Change [ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EO340006/pdf ] and my comment on the Statement [ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EO340007/pdf ] were published. However, I was not permitted to publish my Minority Statement in EOS, but only refer to its URL on another website.
In this post, I want to share with you the policy announced by the AGU President, Carol Finn, in two e-mails to me. I extracted the text on this subject from her e-mails to me (which were also copied to others at the AGU, so that these e-mails should be considered open communications).
View original post 321 more words