73 CO2 AGW Climate Models Are An Epic Fail!
73 CO2 AGW Climate Models are an EPIC FAIL!!!
The day of reckoning is at hand for the AGW Alarmists as 73 CO2 AGW Climate models failed to predict observed temperature trends.
1 Comment
Post a comment
-
Jun 10 2013
Martain J is exactly right.
Deception about nuclear physics and the workings of the Sun began in 1946.
George Orwell moved from London to Jura to start writing his warning to the public that same year.
1984 arrived on schedule. In 1983 Nature published a news report on the demise of dogma on the formation of the solar system, but then began blocking publications that showed the Sun itself made our elements and then birthed the solar system five billion years ago.
When I get access to the web, I will post a link to the 1983 report in Nature.
OKM
Let’s see. As noted above, climate models can’t simulate mid-troposphere temperatures. And as we’re seen before, they can’t simulate:
Sea surface temperatures:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/cmip5-model-data-comparison-satellite-era-sea-surface-temperature-anomalies/
Land+Sea Surface Temperatures (GISS LOTI):
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/model-data-comparison-with-trend-maps-cmip5-ipcc-ar5-models-vs-new-giss-land-ocean-temperature-index/
Or Precipitation:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/model-data-precipitation-comparison-cmip5-ipcc-ar5-model-simulations-versus-satellite-era-observations/
When discussing climate models, is it okay to use the word poo?